Submissions

Subscriptions

Competition

Endowment

Contact Us

 

 

Back

 

Submission Guidelines

 

Subscription Information

 

Special Offer on

Back Issues

 

Annual Prizes Competition

 

Make a Gift to the Arts & Letters Endowment

 

Current Issue

 

Back Issues

 

News from our Contributors

 

Arts & Letters Editorial Staff

 

Learn about the MFA Program at GCSU

 

Links

 

 

 

 

 

Friendly Fire: The War on Terror

 

By: Susan Stinson

 

 

Prior to my twenty-eighth birthday, nothing about my life indicated I would join the National Guard.  I worked at a reputable publishing house in New York and was on track to be moderately successful in that field.  I had, within that last year, moved from the promotion / advertising / editing side of the business into the marketing / sales side, where I began feeling locked in by the repetitive, middle-management position I held.  I found myself wanting to branch out into public service—do something personally and professionally to help people on a practical level. 

I toyed with the idea of becoming a New York City cop—even signed up to take the test and bought the study guide.  I interviewed a few Brooklyn detectives and a lawyer—who was once himself a cop, once himself a detective, now charged with the intense responsibly of defending other police officers, those who had gotten jammed up in the system due to complaints made internally or by civilians.  That interview was the most important reason I decided not to go into civilian law enforcement.  There were times, my friend explained, that you got a bad partner—one who would put you in need of the services he, as a lawyer, now provided—and the results could be minor—bad public opinion citations—or severe—not getting a response from other cops for backup. 

This insider information tainted my ideas of police work and my desire to become an officer started to fizzle.

A few weeks later, on a clear September morning in 2001, I was in midtown Manhattan sitting in a business meeting that was scheduled to last all day, and it would have had two planes not purposefully been flown into the World Trade Center’s twin towers.  As I watched the towers collapse on the television in a Park Avenue office, my capacity for reason crumbled under the weight of the images.  I left the building with one thought: that of buying a gun.  I had always considered myself a pacifist, but when challenged, this philosophical stance evaporated—an illusion. The only reason I didn’t buy a gun was that I had no idea where to find one, so I headed on foot toward home wondering if I would have to swim from Manhattan to Brooklyn, speculating on where the next plane would hit. 

I decided that day to join the National Guard.  A few weeks later, I scheduled an appointment with a recruiter in Brooklyn.  We discussed my possible positions in the military, and having both a bachelor’s and a master’s degree, I found out that, as long as my military test score was high enough, I would be eligible for Officer Candidacy School (OCS).  Then I could be trained in the Intelligence field and work stateside.  The recruiter said that as an Officer Candidate I could choose my training option:  Either I could be sworn in as an officer and attend twenty-six weeks of continuous training or I could be sworn in as a Specialist and attend eleven weeks of Basic Combat Training (BCT) then train as an Officer Candidate one weekend a month, two weeks a year for two years.  My enlistment, as an Officer, would be six years, minimum.  I chose the second training option, knowing it was better suited to my full time job in publishing.  Completing the training in twenty-six weeks was tempting, and I knew that by choosing the second option it would take me longer to receive my commission, but I was willing to wait.  Over the next several weeks, I studied for the ASVAB, qualified for OCS, went through a through medical evaluation, and I was sworn in by November 2001.

I provided a singular rational for this decision to others (and myself): in joining the National Guard, I could keep my job in New York and defend the city where I lived—that I loved.  If I got a crack at Osama bin Laden at the same time, I mused, then life would be even better.  After eleven weeks of training, I’d be drilling regularly each month.  I could buy a weapon and practice on a range.  I would help out individuals and families—communities even—in times of natural disaster, pushing aside the more mundane concerns of office work.  I didn’t want to go to war—just stand strong and strongly armed if the war came to me.  The possibility that I might be sent to Afghanistan did not even deter me.  This I could handle. 

As it turned out, however, four months later, I found out firsthand all of the truths about the military that my recruiter had neglected to mention.  I realized, too late, that what I couldn’t handle was the absolute blind obedience I discovered was needed for one to be considered a good soldier.  Even now, though, I understand the necessity for obedience: if an individual soldier is ordered into combat and is simply afraid to move forward, the resulting hesitation could be deadly for the entire group.  Blind obedience to command, however, can also result in great evils.  Take, for example, the Abu Ghraib tortures.  Even after my very short stint in the military, I can almost guarantee those young soldiers who took pictures of and participated in the torturing of the prisoners were either poorly equipped in their training or, worse, encouraged by their superiors to take the illegal and unethical actions.  I say this with almost complete certainty because it takes a complete devotion to one’s superiors in order to make it in the ranks as a soldier.  The slogan “An Army of One” is taken quite seriously: one equals the many.  All actions in the military require teamwork.  All actions are based on the buddy system.  Even normal, daily soldiering is often done in pairs.  One simply does not go it alone in the military and attention to detail and allegiance to command are the primary tools of survival within this system. 

It wasn’t until I’d settled into boot camp, however, that I realized I had been so idealistic when signing up.  Prior to my enlistment, my weekdays and many weekends were consumed by work.  While repetitive in many aspects, the job I’d settled into only a year before did have a steep learning curve, and I struggled to stay ahead of the game.  It was a job that entailed a great amount of responsibility, and I felt honored to have it.  So I worked hard to make it appear to my coworkers that the work came naturally to me.  On an occasional weekend I did go out to clubs to dance or museums to take in an exhibition.  The woman I was dating at the time lived on the west coast, in Los Angeles, so more often than not, I used weekend days and nights to make up for the sleep I lost during the workweek.  So there were one or two things I had neglected to fully consider before joining—namely the fact that I am a lesbian.  I did wonder, briefly, how I would negotiate the rule Don’t ask, don’t tell—the United States Military’s stance on the enlistment of homosexuals; however, I wasn’t overly concerned with the issue.  Instead, I was preoccupied with thoughts of quashing Al Quida terror cells.  Simply put, I signed on to serve my country as a patriot—not as a lesbian. 

If one were to inquire as to why the policy excluding homosexuals from military enlistment exists, the individual would be told that homosexuality is considered incompatible with military enlistment.  That’s it.  Incompatible.  The word itself implies two groups engaged in a hopeless Promethean struggle to become a singular unit—an army of one.  The homosexual who enlists in the service with the notion of serving his or her country is not only subject to a divided sense of conditional acceptance but also a burden of worry as to what will happen when someone does ask or when someone else tells.

Perhaps I shouldn’t have been surprised when, in May of 2002, I watched three women get discharged from active service at Fort Jackson, South Carolina because it was discovered that they were incompatible with military service.  What is ironic, however, is that I, along with my assigned female Fire Guard duty buddy, were the recruits who stumbled upon their incompatibility.  Fire Guard is the United States Military’s in-house night shift—the sand spur in the boots of all enlisted men and women in Basic Combat Training (BCT).  The watch involves getting out of the sack, the rack, at an unnatural hour, just prior to one or three in the morning, changing clothes in the muted yellow light of the sleeping quarters—from PTs, sweats, into BDUs (Battle Dress Uniforms) and donning the appropriate gear to arrive squared-away at post for a two-hour shift. 

Around zero-three-hundred-hours, my buddy and I discovered two women sitting in bed together, talking, as far as I could tell.  My buddy and I had our flashlights on, red lenses bobbing from bunk to bunk to do a head count.  I noticed the women but thought

nothing of their sitting on the same bed.  My buddy, however, noted something was amiss.

“Did you see them?” she asked when we left the bay to compare our totals.

“See what?” I replied, our numbers not matching up.

“They were kissing; that’s so gross” she said.  I looked up at her slowly.

“We have to recount,” I said. “Our numbers are off.”

“Take a look when you go back in.  You’ll see,” she said.  And I did.  The soft red rays of the flashlights we carried did not reach the women entwined on the bed before we did, and we caught the two kissing.  We said nothing, just stood hovering, watching by the bunk. When the women noticed our presence, we moved out into the hallway, completing the additional count. 

“Did you see?” my buddy asked.

“Yep,” I said, tallying.  Our numbers still didn’t match up, and there was no way for me to convince her to change her tally, since the missing soldier—the one marked AWOL on her pad of paper—was actually present, a discrepancy resulting from two women in one bed.

“We should tell someone,” she said.

“Why?  It’s no big deal. Those guys are kids,” I said, looking back at my notes to keep the alarm on my face from her.  I hoped that by pretending nothing was wrong, I might negate her interpretation of the event. 

The tactic didn’t work and there was no way for me to convince her to change her tally.  I remained mute, pinned in the hallway by her silence.  Finally giving into the unspoken command to conform, go along, join the army of one, I changed my numbers to match hers, and we headed back to our post.  I said nothing further of what we’d witnessed.  Working in the quiet, my mind focused on the inconsistencies presenting themselves.  I realized that my assigned buddy wasn’t my buddy after all.  This was not someone who, were she ever to find out that I was gay, would support me.  This was someone to whom I would become an object of ridicule and gossip.  Worse, I realized that in my silent complicity of changing my numbers to reflect hers, I had participated in the temporary erasure of an individual from active duty status.

When we were relieved from post, we returned to the bay to ready for morning muster.  I said nothing about the incident to anyone.  My buddy, on the other hand, told everyone who would listen.  The reactions of the female troops varied. The majority of folks didn’t care who had kissed whom.  It was exciting for others that “at least somebody was getting some.”  There was a group of women in the bay, though, to whom this kissing incident mattered greatly.  For these individuals, about ten in total, the act must have had the equivalent impact of watching snuff porn and having live ammunition fired in their direction: it scared them shitless.  So they did what they had been instructed to do in sensitivity training: they told the Drill Sergeants. 

Ten women, including my buddy from the night before, piled into the Drill Sergeants’ office and rehashed for our superiors what they’d heard and what they’d speculated all along.  It was, to use a military cliché, a cluster-fuck of new proportions.  I sat outside the office with another buddy on a different pretext.  I wanted to hear what was being said and by whom, to know who was in that office and what disciplinary

actions were being planned.  Thirty minutes later, the women piled out.  I looked at each one, independently.  These were the women I had begun to befriend—people who would be responsible for watching my six in combat.  These recruits had absolutely no idea that I was a lesbian, and now knowing how they would respond if they found out, I was alarmed.

Six women were targeted through rumor and innuendo.  I acted immediately in the way I thought best: grabbed my latest buddy, found each of the women under suspicion, and gave them a heads-up about the load of crap that was coming down the pipeline.  They steadied themselves and waited for the impact.  It came swiftly.  The Drill Sergeants told other Drill Sergeants the news, and the word in the ranks spread faster than a command.  Drill Sergeants began nipping at the girls, calling them dykes, saying they just couldn’t believe it—they’d seemed so normal.  Everyone was scrutinized, including me.

One of the Drill Sergeants called me into his office because my name had come up, behind closed doors, as one of the women who had witnessed the homosexual

act.  I figured the gig was up, that I would be implicated by my silence on the matter, and if I was about to be outed, I intended to come out gloriously.  A buddy and I went into the office, and the Drill Sergeant asked me to close the door.  I was primed and ready to tell the Drill Sergeant exactly where he could put his merry band of men and women, but I didn’t get the chance.  His questioning disarmed me.

I quickly realized he didn’t know I was a lesbian.  No one knew.  I hadn’t looked the part, and I had remained a silent witness.

“Soldier, why is it that you didn’t tell me about this incident,” he said.

“Drill Sergeant,” we had to preface everything we said with those two words, a Drill Sergeant sandwich they called it, “I don’t think it matters, Drill Sergeant.”

“But it does, and you know better—you saw it and you should have come forward with the others.” 

“Drill Sergeant, ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell, Drill Sergeant.’”

“I am surprised at you,” he snapped. “Next time, you’ll know better.”

I thought next time?  Hell, next time the person outed might be me.  I wondered what would happen to me, physically, if anyone did find out.   We were, after all, in the military.  We did, after all, deal with live munitions all the time—M16s, grenades, and teargas.  What if? was the question on my mind.  What if an unfortunate accident happened during training?  I shook, silently considering the actuality of friendly fire.

I internalized the tongue-lashing, was excused from the office, and sought to go about another day’s business of soldiering. Three of the recruits outed in the incident confessed to actively engaging in homosexual acts and were slated for immediate discharge—but Uncle Sam’s Big Green Machine has its own concept of immediate, usually taking about one or two weeks.  I empathized with the women as they waited.  Empathized, but it would have been foolhardy on my part to stand up and proclaim, “I, too, am a lesbian!” My treatment would have been the same. 

I was incompatible with the U.S. Military for reasons technically different from my sexual orientation, but my sexuality was at the core of the matter.  While I didn’t mind being shot and killed trying to defend the United States from attack, I did, however,

now believe that it was more likely that I would be killed if I stayed in the service.  I realized that, for all intents and purposes, I was the enemy—outside the army of one.  No particular person, mind you, but sometime, somewhere, something, or someone would do the job—blind obedience to command would see to that if word got out.

In military training, when one person commits an act that goes against the rules, then everyone is effected by that person’s actions.  I recall one incident in basic when a soldier purchased a sport drink, a Power Aid, without the Drill Sergeant’s permission.  The Drill Sergeant heard the sports drink as it came through the system and out of the mouth of the machine (we were in a bay area that echoed sound). By the time he made it to the door to check on the bay, the soldier and the drink were gone.  So the Drill Sergeant ordered everyone in Alpha Company downstairs and outside into the open bay.  When we were all assembled, we were disciplined through strength training: in other words, we did pushups.  Everyone did pushups and no one was allowed to leave the area until the soldier who committed the crime came forward and confessed.  It took over an hour for the guilty kid to muster up the courage to accept responsibility. 

The incident is funny to me.  It was funny then and it tickles me still because it was such a trivial matter: a juice drink.  But in the military, this incident is symptomatic of a larger problem: the military’s insistence on blind obedience to authority.  Abu Ghraib was not funny, and I have little doubt that the crimes there weren’t orchestrated by people much higher up than Spec. Sabrina Harman.  My rank in Basic was that of a Specialist, and had I, fifteen weeks later, been sent to Afghanistan or Iraq to guard

prisoners whom my superiors told me were terrorists then, to say the least, I would have been edgy.  Had my superiors then told me to pile up the terrorists, naked, and take pictures of them to break their spirits, use as propaganda, and get them to confess, well, I may have done that too.  They are, after all, terrorists, right?  And had my superiors then ordered me to put a bag over the head of one of the prisoners and make another prisoner perform sexual acts on him, I would have disobeyed the command, right? 

That is what I tell myself, but in a land where friends are here today and shot beside you tomorrow, how should a person act?  In this war zone where soldiers are constantly under fire, threatened by car bombs, watching men and women they love as family—sometimes even as lovers (sometimes, regardless of sexuality, in secret)—come back to encampments day after day in pieces to be zipped into body bags and flown home, how can people claim to know how they would react?  In this land where bodies lie in the street in situ while civilians stand by causally smoking and life goes on at the corner grocery, how can anyone be sure?  Especially when my job is on the line, my reputation as a soldier, and the fact that my hesitation may cause the deaths of so many.

I am certain only of one thing:  I would have been killed had I stayed in the service.  Perhaps through the incompetence that causes friendly fire, maybe by a hate crime like the one that killed Allen Schindler in 1993, maybe by my own hand if I had been ordered to participate in anything remotely similar to the events at Abu Ghraib, but I was lucky.  During my ninth of eleven weeks of BCT, I developed fractures in my left leg.  Fractures of this sort occur when the body’s muscle mass cannot support the weight that it carries (in the form of ruck sacks and other equipment).  Instead of building additional muscle, the body responds by cuing the bones to try and compensate for the lack.  Unable to do so, the bone starts to break on the cellular level.  Unlike a standard break, which runs on a left to right axis across the bone, the fracture begins to split the bone lengthwise on an up and down axis.  As the result of too much weight bearing pressure, week after week, for nine weeks, I fractured my leg in several places and suffered from depression, diagnosed as PTSD upon leaving the service, and was discharged under a Section Two—Uncharacterized.  All told, I had been in the service just under six months—five and a half years less than I anticipated—so Honorable and Dishonorable weren’t even terms that applied. 

Uncharacterized was how I felt about my entire military experience.  I showed no character in failing to defend the women who were discharged for being homosexuals.  I could show no allegiance to the soldiers in my platoon once I witnessed the hand these homosexuals were dealt.  I wasn’t the type of patriot the armed services wanted.  I couldn’t go to war with this group.  I also couldn’t go into a war that I didn’t agree with—at the time I broke my leg, American troops were just entering Iraq.  I hadn’t signed on for this, and the internal and external stressors were too much for my mind and body, which since September 11, 2001 had been breaking down, the one affected by the other. 

My mind, in fact, had been breaking down for a long while.  At times before joining the service, my thoughts edged me forward into conflict, into fantasies of making the enemy pay for its crimes.  At other times my thoughts reeled back to my Pakistani neighbors next door who had been shy about leaving their apartment before the terrorist attacks and who now, even as I knocked on the door to check on them, seemed never to emerge from their confinement.  As I prepared to enter the service, I ran every morning to get in shape, reading the newspapers, watching the television to find out what the enemy was up to, and working as a volunteer for the Red Cross at Ground Zero when I could.  Anger and fear, sorrow and compassion were enjambed within one another, indistinguishable from one moment to the next. 

Of the incidents recounted here, several happened in the recovery unit soldiers are sent to when they are injured in Basic Training (not in regular BCT).  The recovery unit is called PTRP: Physical Therapy Reconditioning Program.  Soldiers who are built cheap, as the Drill Sergeants say—those who break bones, tear rotator cuffs, sprain limbs, tear hamstrings, and rip ligaments—are sent to this unit to recover over a specified unit of time or be discharged.  I watched for weeks and months as soldiers came through the doors injured then recovered and went back into BCT only to suffer re-injury and land right back in the recovery unit.  I learned the stories of two women who were permanently partially disabled and who spent over one year in the PTRP unit waiting for their paperwork and medical claims to be attended to in Washington D.C.  These soldiers fell through the cracks, and I was joining them. 

Even stateside, the world I found myself in was fractious and torn, and I was being consumed from the inside out.  Body broken, identity questioned, self-erased inside an institution that dealt only with units—squad, platoon, company, battalion—not individuals—there was no bravery and no cowardice that I could claim.  The damage done to government property—my leg full of fractures and my mind that, without rest, was dividing—halving, quartering, splitting into one-eighths, one-sixteenths one-thirty-seconds—was all I had. 

I realize now that I truly was incompatible with the U.S. Military.  My sexuality wasn’t the trigger, but my ability to regain rational thought and objectively consider my sexuality inside the system was.  My thought process—the same one that lead me shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11 to the recruiting office of the National Guard—

finally registered the sacrifice of self that was necessary to engage in battle as part of the army of one.  It was complete.  It was worse than the death of the body.  It was the sacrifice of my own mind and values in favor of another’s, and it was one I wasn’t willing to make. As a lesbian, I would never be considered a patriot—an odd notion when one takes into account the United States’ current dire need for willing enlistment.  Perhaps the most grotesque irony, however, is the firsthand knowledge that while the military considers homosexuality morally reprehensible, the military’s stance on sexual terrorism, such as that at Abu Ghraib, is to cover it up or spin the actions as appropriate—in accordance with the rules of engagement—as long as no one on the outside asks or is told.  The message the military clearly sends to its enlistees is that it is not appropriate touch anyone, sexually, unless it is to torture them. 

When people talk about the military and service to one’s country, I hesitate now before speaking.  I hesitate because I have the luxury to do so, and were I still in the service, I would not have such leisure time.  What started outside of me in a quickening that took over three thousand individual lives, worked its way through my system like the shrapnel of a claymore mine—friendly fire.  Intolerant extremists, not entire religious sects or populaces, carried out the attacks on the World Trade Center, but it wasn’t until after I had served in and been discharged from the U.S. military that I realized my hatred for the enemy had been born out of my own ignorance and fear of the unknown—a terror as irrational as the military’s fear of homosexuals. 

In the quiet of the nights in the service, on those nights I did sleep, I dreamed only of killing.  I saw myself entangled fights against shadowy figures.  I saw soldiers in fatigues, women and men, in my platoon shot and killed before my eyes.    In these dreams screamed as I killed other people and then as one of them killed me.   The people in my dreams, those being killed and those doing the killings, were all Americans.  Now, several years out of the service, I understand that as people of a global community we can only hope to survive the external war on terror by first subsuming the terror of otherness we hold within—the fear of one another is the biggest threat we have to face on American soil.

 

 

Arts & Letters

Campus Box 89

Georgia College & State University

Milledgeville, GA  31061

(478) 445-1289

al@gcsu.edu

 

 

Arts & Letters accepts submissions from September 1 to March 1 (postmark deadlines).  For complete information, see submission guidelines.